2006 GMC Sierra vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 5,358 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Sierra (295 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Sierra (454 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 309 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Sierra | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | GMC | Mazda |
Model | Sierra | 3 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5358 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 454 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 78.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5850 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 55 L |