2006 GMC Sierra vs. 2010 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2010 Chrysler 300 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 5,358 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Sierra (295 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2010 Chrysler 300. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2010 Chrysler 300.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Sierra (454 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chrysler 300. (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 GMC Sierra | 2010 Chrysler 300 | |
| Make | GMC | Chrysler |
| Model | Sierra | 300 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5358 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 250 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 454 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5850 mm | 4999 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1882 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 3048 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 68 L |
