2006 GMC Sierra vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (286 HP) has 91 more horse power than 2006 GMC Sierra. (195 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2006 GMC Sierra.
Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 GMC Sierra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Sierra (354 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (353 Nm). This means 2006 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Sierra | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | GMC | Jeep |
Model | Sierra | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 286 HP |
Torque | 354 Nm | 353 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5850 mm | 4821 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2154 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1763 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2916 mm |