2006 GMC Sierra vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Sierra would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Sierra (354 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 2006 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 GMC Sierra | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | GMC | Smart |
| Model | Sierra | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 354 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5850 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 1867 mm |
