2006 GMC Sierra vs. 2013 Volvo C70
To start off, 2013 Volvo C70 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo C70 (224 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2006 GMC Sierra. (195 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2006 GMC Sierra.
Because 2006 GMC Sierra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 GMC Sierra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Sierra (354 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo C70. (236 Nm). This means 2006 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Sierra | 2013 Volvo C70 | |
Make | GMC | Volvo |
Model | Sierra | C70 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 224 HP |
Torque | 354 Nm | 236 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5850 mm | 4615 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2640 mm |