2006 GMC Yukon vs. 1954 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2006 GMC Yukon is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Yukon (335 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 273 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (62 HP @ 3000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Yukon (509 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Jeep CJ. (179 Nm @ 1350 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 GMC Yukon | 1954 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | GMC | Jeep |
| Model | Yukon | CJ |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1954 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5964 cc | 3151 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Torque | 509 Nm | 179 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1350 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2060 mm |
