2006 GMC Yukon vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2006 GMC Yukon is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Yukon (335 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 275 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Yukon (509 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 394 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 GMC Yukon | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | GMC | Nissan |
| Model | Yukon | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5964 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 509 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2540 mm |
