2006 GMC Yukon vs. 1962 Volvo P 1800
To start off, 2006 GMC Yukon is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo P 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo P 1800 would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Yukon (335 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1962 Volvo P 1800. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo P 1800.
Because 2006 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Volvo P 1800. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Yukon (509 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 362 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo P 1800. (147 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo P 1800.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Yukon | 1962 Volvo P 1800 | |
Make | GMC | Volvo |
Model | Yukon | P 1800 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5964 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 84.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 68 L |