2006 GMC Yukon vs. 1980 Talbot 1510
To start off, 2006 GMC Yukon is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Talbot 1510. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Talbot 1510 would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Yukon (335 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 269 more horse power than 1980 Talbot 1510. (66 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1980 Talbot 1510.
Because 2006 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Talbot 1510. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Yukon (509 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 401 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Talbot 1510. (108 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Talbot 1510.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Yukon | 1980 Talbot 1510 | |
Make | GMC | Talbot |
Model | Yukon | 1510 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5964 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 76.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2610 mm |