2006 GMC Yukon vs. 1982 Volvo 260
To start off, 2006 GMC Yukon is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Yukon (335 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1982 Volvo 260. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1982 Volvo 260.
Because 2006 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Volvo 260. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Yukon (509 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volvo 260. (230 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volvo 260.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Yukon | 1982 Volvo 260 | |
Make | GMC | Volvo |
Model | Yukon | 260 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5964 cc | 2849 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 73 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2660 mm |