2006 GMC Yukon vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2006 GMC Yukon is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 GMC Yukon. (509 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 GMC Yukon.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Yukon | 2000 Holden HRT | |
Make | GMC | Holden |
Model | Yukon | HRT |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5964 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 509 Nm | 815 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |