2006 GMC Yukon vs. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2006 GMC Yukon is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Yukon (295 HP) has 73 more horse power than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. (222 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Yukon (455 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. (407 Nm). This means 2006 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Yukon | 2001 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | GMC | Land Rover |
Model | Yukon | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5359 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 222 HP |
Torque | 455 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2550 mm |