2006 GMC Yukon vs. 2002 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 GMC Yukon is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Yukon (335 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Yukon (509 Nm) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ranger. (207 Nm). This means 2006 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 GMC Yukon | 2002 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | GMC | Ford |
| Model | Yukon | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5964 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 509 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 55 L |
