2006 GMC Yukon vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2006 GMC Yukon is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru R2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru R2 would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Yukon (335 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 283 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (52 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Yukon (509 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 445 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (64 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Yukon | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | GMC | Subaru |
Model | Yukon | R2 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5964 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 64 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 56 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 66.8 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 30 L |