2006 GMC Yukon vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Yukon weights approximately 1162 kg more than 2012 Volvo C30.
Because 2006 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Yukon (455 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volvo C30. (350 Nm). This means 2006 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volvo C30.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 GMC Yukon | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | GMC | Volvo |
| Model | Yukon | C30 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5359 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 455 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2613 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 60 L |
