2006 GMC Yukon vs. 2013 Kia Optima
To start off, 2013 Kia Optima is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Yukon (335 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2013 Kia Optima. (270 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2013 Kia Optima.
Because 2006 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Kia Optima. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Yukon (509 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Kia Optima. (365 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Yukon | 2013 Kia Optima | |
Make | GMC | Kia |
Model | Yukon | Optima |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5964 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 365 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4845 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2795 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 70 L |