2006 GMC Yukon vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Yukon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Yukon weights approximately 1595 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2006 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Yukon (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 GMC Yukon | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | GMC | Smart |
| Model | Yukon | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 285 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2435 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 1867 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 33 L |
