2006 GMC Yukon vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Yukon would be higher.
Because 2006 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Yukon (509 Nm) has 379 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 2006 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Yukon | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | GMC | Smart |
Model | Yukon | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 509 Nm | 130 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 1867 mm |