2006 Holden Barina vs. 1967 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2006 Holden Barina is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,738 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Holden Barina | 1967 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Holden | Sunbeam |
| Model | Barina | Tiger |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 4738 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1570 mm |
