2006 Holden Barina vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2006 Holden Barina is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Barina. (197 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Barina. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 2006 Holden Barina has manual transmission. 2006 Holden Barina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Holden Barina | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Barina | CU-X |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 99 HP |
Torque | 197 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |