2006 Holden Barina vs. 2004 Holden UTE
To start off, 2006 Holden Barina is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Holden UTE would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Barina. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Barina.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Holden Barina | 2004 Holden UTE | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | Barina | UTE |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 204 HP |
Torque | 197 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1850 mm |