2006 Holden Barina vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Holden Barina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Holden Barina would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 333 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Barina. (197 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Barina.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Holden Barina | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | Barina | UTE |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 197 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |