2006 Holden Commodore vs. 1953 Hudson Hornet
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 217 more horse power than 1953 Hudson Hornet. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1953 Hudson Hornet.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Holden Commodore | 1953 Hudson Hornet | |
| Make | Holden | Hudson |
| Model | Commodore | Hornet |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5976 cc | 4810 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 360 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
