2006 Holden Commodore vs. 1963 Triumph TR4
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph TR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph TR4 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 256 more horse power than 1963 Triumph TR4. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph TR4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph TR4. (172 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph TR4.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Holden Commodore | 1963 Triumph TR4 | |
Make | Holden | Triumph |
Model | Commodore | TR4 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5976 cc | 2138 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 360 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 172 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |