2006 Holden Commodore vs. 1967 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 325 more horse power than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1967 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Holden Commodore | 1967 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Holden | Suzuki |
| Model | Commodore | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 5976 cc | 785 cc |
| Horse Power | 360 HP | 35 HP |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.4 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
