2006 Holden Commodore vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 333 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (27 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Holden Commodore | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Holden | ZAZ |
| Model | Commodore | 966 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5976 cc | 887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 360 HP | 27 HP |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
