2006 Holden Commodore vs. 1973 Renault 12
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Renault 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Renault 12 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 307 more horse power than 1973 Renault 12. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1973 Renault 12.
Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Renault 12, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Renault 12. (96 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Renault 12.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Holden Commodore | 1973 Renault 12 | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | Commodore | 12 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5976 cc | 1288 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 360 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
