2006 Holden Commodore vs. 1982 Mercury LN7
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury LN7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury LN7 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 290 more horse power than 1982 Mercury LN7. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1982 Mercury LN7.
Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mercury LN7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mercury LN7. (121 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mercury LN7.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Holden Commodore | 1982 Mercury LN7 | |
Make | Holden | Mercury |
Model | Commodore | LN7 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5976 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 360 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 121 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |