2006 Holden Commodore vs. 1987 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 273 more horse power than 1987 Jeep Cherokee. (87 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1987 Jeep Cherokee.
Because 1987 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Jeep Cherokee. (180 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Holden Commodore | 1987 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Holden | Jeep |
Model | Commodore | Cherokee |
Year Released | 2006 | 1987 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5976 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 360 HP | 87 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 180 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |