2006 Holden Commodore vs. 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 197 more horse power than 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (163 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (237 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Holden Commodore | 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Holden | Oldsmobile |
Model | Commodore | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2006 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5976 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 360 HP | 163 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |