2006 Holden Commodore vs. 1992 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Toyota MR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Toyota MR2 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 206 more horse power than 1992 Toyota MR2. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1992 Toyota MR2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Toyota MR2. (191 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Toyota MR2.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Holden Commodore | 1992 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | Commodore | MR2 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5976 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 360 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 191 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |