2006 Holden Commodore vs. 1996 Kia Capital
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Kia Capital. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Kia Capital would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 246 more horse power than 1996 Kia Capital. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1996 Kia Capital.
Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Kia Capital, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Kia Capital. (152 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Kia Capital.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Holden Commodore | 1996 Kia Capital | |
| Make | Holden | Kia |
| Model | Commodore | Capital |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5976 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 360 HP | 114 HP |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
