2006 Holden Commodore vs. 1998 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 219 more horse power than 1998 Mitsubishi Magna. (141 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1998 Mitsubishi Magna.
Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mitsubishi Magna. (206 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mitsubishi Magna.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Holden Commodore | 1998 Mitsubishi Magna | |
| Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Commodore | Magna |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5976 cc | 2351 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 360 HP | 141 HP |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
