2006 Holden Commodore vs. 1999 Seat Toledo
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Seat Toledo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Seat Toledo would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 212 more horse power than 1999 Seat Toledo. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1999 Seat Toledo.
Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Seat Toledo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Seat Toledo. (206 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Seat Toledo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Holden Commodore | 1999 Seat Toledo | |
| Make | Holden | Seat |
| Model | Commodore | Toledo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5976 cc | 2324 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 360 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
