2006 Holden Commodore vs. 2000 Jaguar XKR
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar XKR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar XKR would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKR (370 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2006 Holden Commodore. (360 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKR should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKR (541 Nm) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Commodore. 2000 Jaguar XKR has automatic transmission and 2006 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2006 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Jaguar XKR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Holden Commodore | 2000 Jaguar XKR | |
| Make | Holden | Jaguar |
| Model | Commodore | XKR |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5976 cc | 3982 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 360 HP | 370 HP |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 541 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
