2006 Holden Commodore vs. 2000 Volkswagen Beetle
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volkswagen Beetle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volkswagen Beetle would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 193 more horse power than 2000 Volkswagen Beetle. (167 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2000 Volkswagen Beetle.
Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Beetle, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Volkswagen Beetle. (220 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Volkswagen Beetle.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Holden Commodore | 2000 Volkswagen Beetle | |
Make | Holden | Volkswagen |
Model | Commodore | Beetle |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5976 cc | 2324 cc |
Horse Power | 360 HP | 167 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 220 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.4 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |