2006 Holden Commodore vs. 2002 Lancia Lybra
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lancia Lybra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lancia Lybra would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 258 more horse power than 2002 Lancia Lybra. (102 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2002 Lancia Lybra.
Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lancia Lybra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lancia Lybra. (144 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lancia Lybra.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Holden Commodore | 2002 Lancia Lybra | |
Make | Holden | Lancia |
Model | Commodore | Lybra |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5976 cc | 1581 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 360 HP | 102 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 144 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |