2006 Holden Commodore vs. 2002 Volkswagen Golf
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volkswagen Golf. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volkswagen Golf would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 127 more horse power than 2002 Volkswagen Golf. (113 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2002 Volkswagen Golf.
Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen Golf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Volkswagen Golf. (172 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Volkswagen Golf.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Holden Commodore | 2002 Volkswagen Golf | |
Make | Holden | Volkswagen |
Model | Commodore | Golf |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2564 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 113 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 172 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |