2006 Holden Commodore vs. 2004 Peugeot 607
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Peugeot 607. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Peugeot 607 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 200 more horse power than 2004 Peugeot 607. (160 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2004 Peugeot 607.
Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Peugeot 607, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Peugeot 607. (217 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Peugeot 607. 2004 Peugeot 607 has automatic transmission and 2006 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2006 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Peugeot 607 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Holden Commodore | 2004 Peugeot 607 | |
Make | Holden | Peugeot |
Model | Commodore | 607 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5976 cc | 2229 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 360 HP | 160 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 217 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.4 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |