2006 Holden Commodore vs. 2005 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Rover 75 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 212 more horse power than 2005 Rover 75. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2005 Rover 75.
Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Rover 75. (215 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Holden Commodore | 2005 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Holden | Rover |
| Model | Commodore | 75 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5976 cc | 1796 cc |
| Horse Power | 360 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.4 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |
