2006 Holden Commodore vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 277 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (83 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (118 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Holden Commodore | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Holden | Volkswagen |
Model | Commodore | Polo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5976 cc | 1423 cc |
Horse Power | 360 HP | 83 HP |
Torque | 290 Nm | 118 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.4 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |