2006 Holden Commodore vs. 2008 Lexus ES

To start off, 2008 Lexus ES is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 88 more horse power than 2008 Lexus ES. (272 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2008 Lexus ES.

Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Lexus ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Lexus ES (344 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2008 Lexus ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Commodore. 2008 Lexus ES has automatic transmission and 2006 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2006 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Lexus ES will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Holden Commodore 2008 Lexus ES
Make Holden Lexus
Model Commodore ES
Year Released 2006 2008
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5976 cc 3441 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 360 HP 272 HP
Torque 290 Nm 344 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Fuel Consumption Overall 14.4 L/100km 10.7 L/100km