2006 Holden Commodore vs. 2011 GMC Acadia

To start off, 2011 GMC Acadia is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 72 more horse power than 2011 GMC Acadia. (288 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2011 GMC Acadia.

Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 GMC Acadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 GMC Acadia (366 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2011 GMC Acadia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Commodore. 2011 GMC Acadia has automatic transmission and 2006 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2006 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 GMC Acadia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: