2006 Honda Accord vs. 1970 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2006 Honda Accord is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Honda Accord is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda Accord (160 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1970 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda Accord should accelerate faster than 1970 ZAZ 966.
Because 1970 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Honda Accord (217 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Honda Accord will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Honda Accord | 1970 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Honda | ZAZ |
| Model | Accord | 966 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2360 cc | 887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
