2006 Honda Accord vs. 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2006 Honda Accord is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 216 kg more than 2006 Honda Accord.
Because 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Honda Accord | 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Honda | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Accord | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 166 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1990 kg | 2206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.4 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 107 L |