2006 Honda Civic vs. 1987 Lada Samara
To start off, 2006 Honda Civic is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Lada Samara would be higher. At 1,802 cc, 2006 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda Civic (113 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1987 Lada Samara. (52 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1987 Lada Samara.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Honda Civic has automatic transmission and 1987 Lada Samara has manual transmission. 1987 Lada Samara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Honda Civic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Honda Civic | 1987 Lada Samara | |
Make | Honda | Lada |
Model | Civic | Samara |
Year Released | 2006 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1802 cc | 1100 cc |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6 L/100km | 8.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.4 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 43 L |