2006 Honda Civic vs. 1992 Rover 220
To start off, 2006 Honda Civic is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 220 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Rover 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Rover 220 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2006 Honda Civic. (113 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Rover 220 should accelerate faster than 2006 Honda Civic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Rover 220 (180 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Honda Civic. (148 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 1992 Rover 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Honda Civic. 2006 Honda Civic has automatic transmission and 1992 Rover 220 has manual transmission. 1992 Rover 220 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Honda Civic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Honda Civic | 1992 Rover 220 | |
Make | Honda | Rover |
Model | Civic | 220 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1802 cc | 1994 cc |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 55 L |