2006 Honda Civic vs. 2013 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Honda Civic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Honda Civic would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-9 (269 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 2006 Honda Civic. (113 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2006 Honda Civic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Honda Civic. (148 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Honda Civic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Honda Civic | 2013 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Honda | Mazda |
Model | Civic | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1802 cc | 3726 cc |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5108 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1728 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.4 L/100km | 12.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 76 L |