2006 Honda CR-V vs. 1948 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2006 Honda CR-V is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda CR-V (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1948 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1948 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Honda CR-V weights approximately 68 kg more than 1948 Volvo PV 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Volvo PV 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Honda CR-V | 1948 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Honda | Volvo |
| Model | CR-V | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1948 |
| Engine Size | 2204 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1698 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2850 mm |
