2006 Honda CR-V vs. 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2006 Honda CR-V is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 2006 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Honda CR-V | 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Honda | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | CR-V | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1951 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 3690 mm |
